← Radar

Incident case file

Sign in to watch

ZachXBT Ongoing EVM Wallet Drainer Campaign (Active Since Dec 2025)

Incident date December 25, 2025

0 views

ActiveMultiple EVM (EthereumBSCBaseArbitrumPolygon)Wallet drainer campaign (root cause unidentified)Cluster: ZACHXBT-MULTI-2025-12

Estimated loss

$107K

Victims identified

100
Victim group joining is coming soon.

Investigation

10%

Facts and investigation

Attacker: 0xAc2e5153170278e24667a580baEa056ad8Bf9bFB

Funds moved to: TODO — no public laundering trace; drainer-style consolidation suspected
Primary attacker cluster: 0xAc2e5153170278e24667a580baEa056ad8Bf9bFB (ZachXBT-published). Initial estimate $107K cumulative loss as of December 2025 - January 2026 alerts. Chain breakdown at initial alert: Ethereum ~$54,655 plus residual across BSC, Base, Arbitrum, Polygon. Pattern: each victim wallet loses less than $2,000 to evade automatic alerts. Hundreds of wallets affected. Root cause remains publicly unidentified; suspected hypotheses include Trust Wallet browser extension contagion (post

Timeline: On approximately December 25, 2025, ZachXBT first publicly flagged an ongoing wallet-drainer campaign targeting EVM chain users with a distinctive low-value-per-victim pattern (under $2,000 per wallet to avoid triggering automatic security alerts). The primary attacker cluster identified is 0xAc2e5153170278e24667a580baEa056ad8Bf9bFB. By the initial reporting window (December 2025 - January 2026), cumulative losses had reached approximately $107,000 across hundreds of wallets, with Ethereum representing the largest share (~$54,655). The campaign has continued through 2026 with no publicly identified root cause; security researchers have suggested possible links to the Trust Wallet browser extension contagion (which itself was disclosed December 24, 2025), MetaMask 'mandatory upgrade' phishing emails, or a generic drainer toolkit. The campaign's activity during the May 1-16, 2026 window is not explicitly confirmed in recent public reporting and would benefit from direct on-chain validation against the attacker cluster. This entry is retained as a contextual marker; loss figures should be treated as an initial cumulative estimate rather than a fresh-window measurement.

Sources and coverage

Victim testimonies

No testimonies yet.

+ Add my testimony → (coming soon)